Que elijáis no contestar en este proyecto mientras contestáis en otros proyectos y foros es una muestra más de que vuestras intenciones no son buenas, que tenéis mucho que esconder y que no habéis sido honrados ni sinceros en ninguna parte del proyecto.

Well, apparently you can pre-order the campaign items/pledge bundles on their website. It only shows as "pre-order item" if you place it in a basket... but regardless of where I looked, I found absolutely no shipping estimate. Yeah.. so apparently taking more ppls money is fine, but providing a shipping date continues to be out of the question.

I would like to request an update regarding the crowdfunding project. At this point, the delay and the complete lack of communication are becoming increasingly concerning. I understand that projects can encounter difficulties, but the absence of any meaningful update for such a long period is worrying not only for me but also for many other backers. I believe it is important that everyone who is concerned to make a post to express their concerns. Supporters have invested their trust and money in this project, and regular communication should be expected, even when there are setbacks. Could you please provide a clear update on the current status of the project and what backers should realistically expect going forward? I look forward to your response.

Dear members of Shadowlands Games, On your BackerKit site for “Call of the Sea: The Everhart Expedition” you state: “We are committed to transparency and communication to our backers.“ That is clearly not true. I am deeply frustrated with the current state of communication surrounding this project. There have been no updates for several months, despite the fact that the originally promised shipping window of April 2026 has already passed. At the same time, I am aware that your other projects appear to be in a similarly stalled state, which raises serious concerns about your studio’s capacity to fulfill its commitments. I have been following the updates on your other projects as well, and I have noticed a recurring pattern: printer issues are consistently cited as the reason for delays. While production problems can of course arise, this explanation appearing repeatedly across multiple projects starts to feel less like an isolated incident and more like a systemic issue — or, frankly, a convenient excuse. I would expect a publisher with your experience to either have contingency plans in place or to be more transparent about the root causes. This matters to me personally because my pledge includes not only “Call of the Sea” but also “Scions of the Dark Goddess“. The ongoing delays and lack of communication therefore affect me on multiple fronts simultaneously. I am formally requesting: 1. A clear and honest update on the current status of both projects included in my pledge. 2. A revised and realistic delivery timeline — not a placeholder date. 3. A specific explanation of the printer issues: which printer, what went wrong, and what steps are being taken to resolve it. I backed your projects because I believed in them. Please do not make me regret that decision. Sincerely, David

I think it is important that all backers are aware of something that has happened recently. Several delayed projects, including Terraforming Mars and Call of the Sea, have been hidden or removed from the company's BackerKit profile. These are not completed projects. These are projects that are still affected by significant delays and unresolved concerns from backers. Why would a company choose to make delayed projects less visible? This is not a minor administrative change. Visibility matters. When potential customers visit a company's profile, they should be able to see both its successes and its outstanding obligations. Hiding delayed projects makes it harder for people to understand the company's actual track record and the number of projects that remain undelivered. At a time when communication is already scarce, questions are going unanswered for months, and backers are repeatedly being asked for more patience, the decision to hide delayed campaigns sends a very troubling message. Every backer should be aware that these projects existed on the profile and that they are no longer visible in the same way. Whether there is an innocent explanation or not, the company owes its backers a clear and public explanation for this decision. Transparency means showing the good and the bad. It does not mean making delayed projects disappear from view while asking people to continue trusting the company with new campaigns and more money. The lack of communication is concerning. The delays are concerning. But actively reducing the visibility of delayed projects is, by far, the most alarming development we have seen so far. /////// Creo que es importante que todos los mecenas sean conscientes de algo que ha ocurrido recientemente. Varios proyectos con retrasos, entre ellos Terraforming Mars y Call of the Sea, han sido ocultados o eliminados del perfil de la empresa en BackerKit. No estamos hablando de proyectos finalizados. Estamos hablando de proyectos que siguen acumulando retrasos importantes y sobre los que todavía existen numerosas preocupaciones sin resolver por parte de los mecenas. ¿Por qué una empresa decidiría hacer menos visibles precisamente los proyectos que tienen retrasos? No se trata de un cambio menor ni de un detalle administrativo. La visibilidad importa. Cuando alguien visita el perfil de una empresa, debería poder ver tanto sus éxitos como sus compromisos pendientes. Ocultar proyectos retrasados dificulta que los potenciales clientes y los propios mecenas puedan valorar el historial real de la empresa y el número de proyectos que siguen sin entregarse. En un momento en el que la comunicación es prácticamente inexistente, las preguntas permanecen sin respuesta durante meses y se sigue pidiendo paciencia a los mecenas, la decisión de ocultar campañas retrasadas transmite un mensaje extremadamente preocupante. Todos los mecenas deberían saber que estos proyectos estaban visibles en el perfil y que ahora ya no lo están. Independientemente de cuál sea la explicación, la empresa debería dar una explicación pública y clara de por qué ha tomado esta decisión. La transparencia consiste en mostrar tanto lo bueno como lo malo. No consiste en hacer desaparecer de la vista los proyectos retrasados mientras se sigue pidiendo confianza para nuevas campañas y nuevos fondos. Los retrasos son preocupantes. La falta de comunicación es preocupante. Pero la decisión deliberada de reducir la visibilidad de proyectos pendientes de entrega es, con diferencia, el aspecto más alarmante de toda esta situación.